Tomato Workers to Hold Hunger Strike at Supermarket’s Head Office

Let them eat tomatoes

Let them eat tomatoes

 

The Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) should be celebrating. Last week Trader Joe’s signed a Fair Food Agreement with the Florida-based labor justice group. The agreement grants basic rights and higher wages to Florida tomato harvesters.

But the celebrations were short-lived. The CIW announced that 50 of its members and their supporters would be going on a fast. For six days, beginning March 5, the Fast for Fair Food will take place at the headquarters of Publix Supermarkets, a $25-billion, Florida-based company that operates more than 1,000 stores in the Southeast.

“We are fasting today so that tomorrow none of our children are forced to surrender their dignity or to suffer hunger just to work,” Darinel Sales, one of the workers who will be taking part, wrote in an email.

Read the rest at TakePart

Post to Twitter

Proof–Once Again–That Organic Can Feed the World

 

A good egg

A good egg

No, the egg on the right was not laid by an ostrich.

It was laid by one of my aged hens. The 10-bird flock dines on organic feed and ranges freely (weather permitting). By comparison, the runty egg on the left came from an inorganic factory farm where hens are kept in tiny cages. It was labeled ”Grade A Large.”

What does that make my egg?

Post to Twitter

The CDC Refuses to Reveal the Name of the Restaurant Chain that Poisoned More Than 60 Customers. Thank God for Scrappy Reporters

aka Restaurant Chain A

aka Restaurant Chain A

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) handling of a recent investigation into a salmonella outbreak that sickened 68 people in 10 states—sending more than 20 to the hospital—had all the elements of a B-grade spy movie. The CDC identified the source of the contaminated food, but refused to make the name public, instead calling it Restaurant Chain A, and saying only that it was a Mexican chain. It could have been any one of six such chains that operated in the affected states.

That seemed like odd behavior from an agency whose responsibility is to save lives, protect Americans, and save money through prevention. Although no one died in this outbreak, which came to light last fall, salmonella is frequently fatal, so outing the culprit could have saved lives. Revealing the identity of the mysterious Restaurant Chain A would have allowed customers to protect themselves by avoiding the place, if they chose. And a little negative publicity might have been just what was needed to convince those in charge of the company to clean up their act, perhaps preventing future outbreaks.

But the CDC kept the eatery’s identity under wraps.

This did not sit well with Bill Marler, a Seattle attorney whose firm specializes in litigating food-borne illness cases. Marler is nothing if not tenacious—just ask the dozens of food processers and fast-food outlets who have paid more than $600 million in claims to his clients in the past two decades.

The CDC has a policy of seeking “cordial relationships” with companies who supply information voluntarily,” said its deputy director, Robert Tauxe in an interview with MSNBC that was quoted on Marler’s blog. It publicly identifies a source of food-borne illness, he said, “only when people can use that information to take specific action to protect their health.” The reason Restaurant Chain A had been admitted to the CDC’s equivalent of a witness protection program was that the outbreak had already run its course.

Reporters for Food Safety News, an online newspaper funded by Marler’s firm contacted all six of the possible companies. They either refused to reply or insisted that they were not Restaurant Chain A. The reporters kept digging and eventually received a document leaked from Oklahoma’s Department of Health. (Oklahoma was one of the affected states). Marked “for internal use only” the document was called “Summary of Supplemental Questionnaire Responses Specific to Taco Bell Exposure of Oklahoma Outbreak Associated Cases Multistate Salmonella Enterititis Outbreak Investigation.” It’s a long, convoluted title, but the important words were “Taco Bell.”

Even once Taco Bell was outed, the CDC maintained its code of omerta. Taco Bell, which the CDC found to have been responsible for a 2006 E. coli 0157:H7 outbreak that sickened more than 70 customers in the Northeast, did not return my call, but the company did put a cryptic post on its website  linking to the CDC’s investigative report about the recent salmonella outbreak but did not own up to being at fault.

A restaurant poisons its customers. A government agency colludes to keep its identity under wraps. And it takes a scrappy group of reporters to uncover the truth for Americans. Talk about a sickening situation.

Post to Twitter

Way to Go, Joe. Major Victory for Tomato Workers. Trader Joe’s Signs Fair Food Agreement

Thanks, Joe.

Thanks, Joe.

Trader Joe’s, a national grocery chain with more than 350 outlets in nine states, has become the second major food retailer to sign on to the Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ (CIW) Fair Food Agreement.

For a more than a decade, the CIW, a grassroots farmworkers’ rights organization, has tried to persuade supermarket chains, fast food outlets, and other major produce buyers to sign Fair Food Agreements. The agreements give workers a raise from $50 to $80 a day and assure them basic rights that virtually every other employee in the United States enjoys, including accurate time keeping, clearly defined grievance procedures, safety education, and protection from violence and sexual harassment in the fields.

Fast food chains like McDonald’s and Burger King and institutional food-service companies like Sodexo came aboard. The Florida Tomato Growers Exchange, a cooperative representing all major growers in the state agreed to join the Fair Food effort. But with the exception of Whole Foods Market, not a single grocery retailer cooperated, until now.

Read the rest at TakePart.com

Post to Twitter

New “Food Hub” Makes Small-Scale, Sustainable Food Production Financially Viable

Finsen makin' bacon.

Finsen makin' bacon.

Take pity on male baby goats. Their sisters look forward to long lives providing milk for cheese or fiber for yarn. But for most goatherds in this country, bucklings, as the little fellows are called, are inconvenient byproducts. With no infrastructure for the processing and distribution of their meat, many young bucks are simply euthanized and their carcasses discarded.

To Shirley Richardson, co-owner of Tannery Farm Cashmeres in northeastern Vermont, that waste was unaceptable. Richardson, who raises breeding goats to sell to other farmers and harvests cashmere from her own herd, realized that there was a growing demand for the tasty, high-protein, low-fat meat of young goats that wasn’t being tapped by local farmers, who were too small and scattered to effectively get it to market. So she launched Vermont Chevon Meats, a collective of farmers.

As Richardson expected, there was no shortage of farmers who wanted to sell through Vermont Chevon and plenty of potential buyers. Unfortunately, though, the Northeast had very few slaughter and processing facilities, and those that operated in the region focused on cattle. As a start-up operation, Vermont Chevon lacked the capital and volume of business to justify investing in its own processing facility.

Enter Mad River Food Hub, the brain child of Robin Morris. Opened in late 2011, the hub is the only government-inspected processing, storage, and distribution facility for both meat and produce in the Northeast, according to Morris.

When I visited in January, the hub’s offices still had a whiff of new construction about them and a gleaming flash freezer waited on a pallet beside a loading dock for installation. Even though the hub is a couple of months away from completion and is awaiting final certification from the United States Department of Agriculture (it is certified by Vermont), Richardson is among 10 area farmers that are already using the 4,000-square-foot $250,000 facility.

“The hub is a central point in the community that helps farmers in any way they need,” said Morris. “What we are offering is like a smorgasbord. They can choose any of our services they need.”

Customers can rent space from the hub when they need it at daily rates. The meat-processing room, fully equipped with cutting implements, stainless steel counters and sinks, a grinder, a sausage machine, and a vacuum packager, rents for $150 per day. A similarly outfitted room for baking and produce processing costs $200 per day. Clients pay to store their products the hub’s warehouse-like refrigerator and freezer. Once a week, a delivery truck leaves the hub to distribute those goods to restaurants and grocery stores in Burlington, Vermont’s largest city (about 40 miles away) and several other nearby towns. Calling on his experience as a former executive at American Flatbread, a pizza company with roots in the Mad River Valley, Morris consults with clients on financial and marketing issues.

“The state-of-the-art equipment required more capital investment that most small farmers have,” Morris said. “But not having this equipment prevents small producers from being efficient and competitive. The hub gets around that problem.”

On the morning I dropped by the hub, Jacob Finsen, the manager and in-house butcher, was busily converting a pork belly into bacon and pancetta. The pork had come from Von Trapp Farmstead, where brothers Don and Sebastion von Trapp (of that family) revitalized their parents’ organic dairy by converting raw milk into cheese. They feed whey, a byproduct of cheesemaking, to a herd of pigs. Whey-fed pigs command a premium price–about $2.50 a pound dressed. After being cured or converted into sausage, the pork sells for $6 to $15 per pound, making the von Trapp’s farm that much more viable.

Although Morris received government grants to help finance construction of the hub, it is being operated as a for-profit business. “I don’t think it would viable in the long term if we had to go begging for uncertain funding each year,” Morris said. Currently, the hub is operating at between 30 and 40 percent of its capacity. The break-even point, according to Morris, is 60 percent, a figure he expects to meet during the 2012 growing season.

In the meantime, there are other rewards. On a recent evening, Morris, who is a food lover as well as a die-hard advocate for local farming, was dining at a high end bistro on the outskirts of Burlington. He noticed that braised Vermont goat with chanterelles was one of the choices. The meat had come from Richardson’s collective. Finsen had butchered it at Mad River. Without the hub, it would have never found its way onto the restaurant menu as a $27 entré.

Post to Twitter

A Cornfounding Situation: Bioengineering Brought Us Super Weeds, Now Wonder Worms. What is Next from the Labs of Monsanto and Dow?

Some big questions remain.

Some big questions remain.

Advocates for genetically modified crops have never relied on logic to advance their cause. And the same holds true for the government officials who give their blessings to new bioengineered plants. Just look at what has been playing out in the corn industry over the past month or so.

Just before Christmas, the U.S. Department of Agriculture took steps toward approving a new variety of corn engineered by Dow AgroSciences that would survive being sprayed by the herbicide 2,4-D, a component of the notorious weed killer Agent Orange. The chemical may be a carcinogen and causes reproductive problems, neurotoxicity, and immunosuppression, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.

Gary Hirshberg, the chairman of Stonyfield Farm and a long-time crusader for organic agriculture, called the USDA’s move “diabolical” in a recent telephone conversation with me. The agency will make a final decision after a public comment period ends at the end of February.

The reason Dow wants to market the new corn is that weeds in at least 26 states have become resistant to glyposate, a less-toxic herbicide commonly sold under the trade name Roundup. So farmers need corn that can survive being sprayed with a more powerful herbicide, while the weeds growing alongside the corn die — or at least that’s the plan.

For now, 2,4-D still works on weeds, but scientists speculate that — just as they did with Roundup — weeds will inevitably become resistant to 2, 4-D, creating an increasingly vicious cycle as bioengineers come up with crops that can survive applications of ever more toxic herbicides. It’s a neat trick. The companies will profit from problems that their products create.

In a recent issue of the journal Bioscience, a group of researchers led by David Mortensen, a specialist in weed ecology at Penn State University, reported that the introduction of the new 2,4-D-resistant crops was likely to “increase the severity of resistant weeds.” The researchers also concluded that the new crops would result in a significant increase in the use of herbicides.

Regulators at the USDA would have done well to consult with their colleagues over at the Environmental Protection Agency. A month before the USDA opened the door to approval of Dow’s new GMO corn, the EPA took agri-giant Monsanto to task for “inadequate” monitoring. Scientists found signs that rootworms in four states were developing resistance to Monsanto corn that was engineered to produce a natural bacterial insecticide that normally kills caterpillars and worms.

First Super Weeds, now Wonder Worms. What marvel can we expect next from the laboratories of Big Ag?

Check out the OnEarth blog, where this post first appeared.

Post to Twitter

Aquaculture Giant Files Suit to Silence Salmon Farming Critic

Don't try to SLAPP me around.

Don't try to SLAPP me around.

When it comes to shooting themselves in the feet, few industries are as adept as industrial aquaculture.

The most recent example is unfolding in a Vancouver, B. C., courtroom where a subsidiary of Cermaq, a $1.7-billion fish farming conglomerate whose major shareholder is the Norwegian government, is suing the scrappy environmental activist Don Staniford for defamation and making false statements. Mainstream Canada, a subsidiary of Cermaq, which filed the suit, is asking for $125,000 and seeking a permanent injunction that would forbid Staniford from speaking out against salmon farming.

Calling the court action a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) meant to intimidate critics of salmon farming, Staniford said in an interview, “This is a case of the Norwegian government using the Canadian legal system to muzzle global criticism of salmon farming.”

Read the Rest at Take Part

or

Wach this Video of the Side of Salmon Farming Business Doesn’t Want You to See

Post to Twitter

Newsbites: Choice Tidbits from the Week in Sustainable Food

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, we do find it a little stressful.

Yes, we do find it a little stressful.

 

 

 

Story of the Week

American farmers routinely give the drug ractopamine hydrochloride to livestock. The chemical, which mimics stress hormones and makes the heart beat more rapidly and promotes growth and the production of lean meat. But at a cost. It has sickened more animals than any other drug on the market and killed more than 200,000 pigs alone, according to reporter Helena Bottemiller, who investigated the story for the Food and Environmental Reporting Network. Traces of ractopamine hydrochloride also have been found in the meat from treated animals. Citing concerns for human safety, European Union and several countries, including China, ban its use. If only the American government was so concerned about our health.

Read the full story on msnbc.com

 

 Bill Gates to World: Embrace GMO Crops or Die!

That was the take-home message from an Associated Press interview last week with the co-founder of Microsoft Corp. Gates criticized those of us in wealthy countries who express skepticism about bioengineering and an agricultural system based on chemical fertilizers and pesticides. I’m shocked—shocked!—but obviously Gates does not read Politics of the Plate, where I recently drew attention to the growing body of scientific research showing that he is dead wrong. The only way to feed the world in the future, particularly its poorest citizens, is to abandon expensive chemicals and high-tech hocus pocus and farm organically.

Read what Gates said to AP

Read my post proving that organic can feed the world

 

Slow Food Fight Round Two

Critics have recently lashed out at Slow Food USA president Josh Viertel for straying from the small and artisanal philosophies upon which the organization was founded and veering into the realm of—God forbid—food justice. In a post that appeared on The Atlantic’s health blog, Viertel comes back swinging in defense of the changes and lands a few through-provoking punches of his own.

Read the full post at Atlantic.com

 

Diluting Organic Standards (Yet Again)

The Cornucopia Institute, a watchdog group, can become downright vicious when protecting and enforcing organic standards. Last week, the institute sank its fangs into the backsides of both Martek Biosciences Corp. and the National Organic Standards Board. Cornucopia formally requested that the USDA launch a corruption investigation over the board’s decision to allow oils formulated by Martek to be used in “organic” dairy products and baby formula. Cornucopia says the products were made from genetically modified soil fungi and processed with synthetic petrochemical solvents.

Read the Cornucopia press release

 Taking to Wings

The Superbowl Sunday is to chickens what Thanksgiving is to turkeys. In its annual Wing Report, the National Chicken Council estimated that football fans are expected to scarf 1.25 billion chicken wings (about four wings for every man, woman, and child in the country) during the big game this year, or about 100 million pounds. The most intriguing morsel of information in the report: “A chicken has two wings, and chicken companies are not able to produce wings without the rest of the chicken.” Yet.

Dig in to the Wing Report

 

A Real Downer from the Supreme Court

The highest court in the land handed down a decision last week overturning a California law to prevent the sale for human consumption of meat from “downer” livestock (animals to weak to stand up). Under federal law, it is illegal to sell people downer cattle. The California law was meant to apply the same restrictions on other animals such as sheep and pigs. One particularly disturbing fact that came to light: Three out of every one hundred pigs that arrive at slaughterhouses are too sick to get up on their feet, but perfectly legal to sell to you and me.

Read the Washington Post’s story on the decision

Post to Twitter

When it Comes to What’s in our Food, Americans have Less Transparency than the Chinese. Stonyfield’s Gary Hirshberg Intends to Change That

Herschberg, Gary

The healthy food movement just got a CE-Yo.

Gary Hirshberg, the head of Stonyfield Farm, announced that he was turning the operation of the Londonderry, New Hampshire- based organic yogurt company over to Walt Freese, who has held executive positions at Ben & Jerry’s in Burlington, Vermont, and Celestial Seasonings in Boulder, Colorado.

Hirshberg (who called himself CE-Yo at Stonyfield) is staying with the company as chairman, but will give up day-to-day operations to focus on the Just Label It Campaign, a year-old effort to convince the government to require foods containing genetically modified (GMO) ingredients to be labeled.

According to Hirshberg, 93 percent of Americans feel they have the right to know if food they buy is bioengineered. Given a choice, shoppers avoid GMO products—which is exactly why the chemical industry has fought labeling.

GMO labeling is required in 50 countries, including the European Union, Japan, Australia, and even Russia and China. “That American consumers don’t have rights granted to Chinese citizens is getting to the point of absurdity,” said Hirshberg.

Read the rest at Take Part

Post to Twitter

The Agrichemical Business Goes on Trial

iStock_000015978766Small

Methyl iodide is one of a family of chemicals that researchers view as well-known cancer hazards. The chemical is also a neurotoxin and causes late-term miscarriages. And it kills soil-dwelling organisms — which is why farmers (particularly strawberry and tomato growers) fumigate fields with it prior to planting.

 Calling it one of the most toxic chemicals used in manufacturing, more than 50 scientists, including five Nobel laureates, wrote a letter (PDF) to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) toward the end of the Bush II administration pleading that methyl iodide not be approved for agricultural use. To no avail. They failed in California, too, which sets its own environmental regulations, independent of the EPA. But the state followed the EPA’s lead and approved it in 2010, just before Governor Schwarzenegger left office.

Last year, lawyers from Earthjustice and California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. filed suit challenging the chemical’s approval on behalf of several environmental and farmworkers groups, who claimed that California officials approved the fumigant despite warnings from scientists in the state’s own Department of Pesticide Regulation. Earlier this month, the case came before the Alameda County Superior Court.

“Nobody disputes that methyl iodide is a potent poison,” Earthjustice lawyer Greg Loarie said in a press release. “By approving the cancer-causing pesticide, California’s pesticide regulators ignored the science and broke important laws designed to protect public health.” Farm laborers and residents of rural areas — particularly children — are most at risk to exposure to methyl iodide, which can be carried on the wind.

Methyl iodide has made no shortage of enemies since being approved. In addition to labor and environmental organizations, their numbers include 35 California legislators who signed a letter last April asking the EPA to “suspend and cancel” all uses of methyl iodide in the United States. At about the same time, the current governor of California, Jerry Brown, promised to reconsider the state’s decision to register methyl iodide. The EPA has opened a public comment period on a petition, asking it to ban methyl iodide, and so far more than 200,000 citizens have written in support of the ban.

In an email to me following an earlier post I wrote, Arysta LifeScience, the manufacturer of methyl iodide, claimed that the chemical is naturally occurring and produced by marine algae. The company said that methyl iodide has been used as a fumigant in the southeast United States since 2007 without a single safety incident reported.

Judge Frank Roesch, who is hearing the California case, is showing that he is no pushover. According to a press release from Pesticide Action Network North America, a plaintiff in the California case, the judge said he found no evidence that the state officials had ever considered not approving methyl iodide. Without such evidence, the judge said that he could not see how the state could “prevail in this lawsuit.”

We’ll see if he still feels that way in a few months, when a decision is expected.

Post to Twitter